Author: Mr. Charalambos Papasavvas
Advocate – Legal Consultant
Managing Partner of PAPASAVVAS & LISKAVIDOU LLC
Founder of RELOTECH EXPERTS
Founder of NEOCOURSES INNOVATION CENTER
Blockchain, Smart Contracts, and Lawyers
Blockchain is widely considered a disruptive technology, with the potential to transform interactions and transactions across numerous sectors, including the legal profession. Smart contracts, which can automatically execute pre-set terms in code without human intervention, may allow many traditional legal tasks to be automated in the near future. This raises significant questions about the future role of lawyers in a blockchain-enabled world. This article explores blockchain technology and smart contracts, as well as the likely impact
on legal services.
Blockchain: A Decentralized, Immutable Ledger
Blockchain has garnered significant media attention, both positive and negative, and is often the subject of debate among individuals, corporations, and governments. Originally popularized by Bitcoin, blockchain applications such as Ethereum have also gained prominence. Understanding blockchain’s features is crucial as it becomes more integrated into mainstream applications.
At its core, blockchain is a decentralized, cryptographic ledger distributed across a peer-to-peer network of computers, known as nodes. It functions as a shared ledger that logs transactions, ensuring each participant has an identical copy. When a new transaction is recorded, the ledger updates automatically for all network members, which is key to its decentralized structure. Unlike traditional financial transactions that rely on central entities like banks, blockchain eliminates intermediaries, allowing individuals to transact directly, which disrupts traditional systems of control.
Traditionally, transferring money or assets involves intermediaries to validate and authenticate transactions, which is particularly important for digital assets like currency and intellectual property. This need has historically prevented direct transfers of digital assets, as it guards against issues like the “double spend problem,” where a digital asset could be duplicated. Blockchain addresses this by encrypting transaction data within blocks, which are validated and timestamped by network members before being linked to previous blocks in an immutable chain. The chain continuously updates, synchronizing every transaction across the network, ensuring a tamper-proof record of ownership.
This decentralized, cryptographic structure not only replaces intermediaries but also enhances security. A bad actor would need to hack multiple linked blocks across all ledgers in the network—a practically impossible feat. Blockchain thus paves the way for a “value
internet,” where value can be transferred directly and securely.
Blockchain’s Potential for Legal Services
Blockchain could significantly reshape the legal industry. Applications range from document service and discovery to digitizing asset registries, such as those for land titles, which can then be exchanged without lawyers drafting transfer documents. Blockchain’s secure
storage and authentication features may also preserve evidence integrity in court proceedings. Although we don’t yet know the full extent of blockchain’s capabilities within law, the technology holds significant disruptive potential, particularly in the form of smart contracts, which this article will now examine.
Smart Contracts: Self-Executing Agreements in Code
Smart contracts are agreements written in code, automatically triggering specific actions when certain conditions are met. These contracts function much like a vending machine, releasing a product when the right conditions are fulfilled, such as the correct payment. This
basic concept, combined with blockchain, allows a wide range of obligations to be automated without a central authority or enforcement mechanism. The Ethereum platform is one example of how blockchain technology is used to execute peer-to-peer smart contracts
with increased security and transparency.
Smart contracts could enable instant asset transfers when specific obligations are met, such as for real estate deals or securities trading, eliminating delays and the need for third parties. They could also manage micro-transactions, reducing human error and increasing contract
clarity. Additionally, “blockchain oracles”—digital tools that verify information in real-time—could enhance the scope of smart contracts. For instance, an oracle might verify flooding conditions to trigger automatic insurance payments, or record a death to execute a will.
Despite their promise, widespread use of smart contracts faces several obstacles. While some contracts can be fully automated, legal contracts that require subjective interpretation are not easily translated into code. For instance, complex terms such as “material adverse
change” or concepts like “good faith” and “reasonableness” are challenging to encode. Consequently, smart contracts may be best suited to straightforward, self-executing tasks, while more nuanced legal contracts may require a hybrid approach that combines code with human input.
Legal Implications of Smart Contracts
Smart contracts pose a unique challenge to existing legal frameworks. Traditional legal contracts require an offer, acceptance, and intent to create a binding agreement. Although smart contracts are often enforceable, ensuring they fulfill these legal elements is essential to validate outcomes in court. To address this, traditional legal terms can be paired with coded agreements to create enforceable “wrapped” smart contracts.
Jurisdictional Challenges
Blockchains operate globally across distributed networks, challenging traditional notions of jurisdiction. Identifying which laws apply to smart contracts or determining the relevant court for disputes is difficult, as blockchain interactions transcend borders. Contracting parties can
mitigate this by specifying jurisdiction and choice of law, but these issues still present potential legal disputes.
Managing Errors and Unintended Outcomes
While smart contracts are designed for certainty, they remain vulnerable to coding errors. Self-execution may result in unintended consequences if bugs exist, as seen in incidents like the DAO attack. Errors are problematic because blockchain’s immutability makes it
impossible to correct once code is deployed. Ensuring smart contracts are error-free will likely become an essential aspect of legal due diligence, potentially involving simulation testing before launch.
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Smart contracts, like traditional contracts, are not immune to disputes. Parties may disagree on a contract’s enforceability, governing jurisdiction, or other issues. Including an arbitration clause in smart contracts may help resolve disputes outside traditional courts.
The Future of Legal Practice: Extinction or Evolution?
As automation grows across industries, the legal profession faces potential shifts. Self-executing contracts could reduce the demand for certain legal tasks, especially in transactional law. However, lawyers are unlikely to become obsolete. Automation will allow legal professionals to focus more on complex legal issues rather than routine tasks. Legal skills in programming or coding are likely to become more valuable, and combined degrees in law and STEM fields may become common. Lawyers with coding expertise will be
essential in drafting and verifying smart contracts. As blockchain applications become mainstream, lawyers will be called upon to address the resulting legal and regulatory concerns.
Lawyers’ roles may evolve, but their expertise will remain valuable. Adapting to blockchain and embracing technology and innovation will enable law firms to stay competitive and meet their clients’ changing needs.
Conclusion
Blockchain technology is transformative. Distributed ledgers have the potential to change how we interact and conduct business. As intermediaries’ roles diminish, lawyers must adapt to this new decentralized environment. Smart contracts could automate many traditional
legal tasks, yet several challenges to widespread adoption mean that legal expertise will still be necessary. By automating repetitive tasks, lawyers will be able to focus on core legal issues while managing larger workloads. Law firms that embrace innovation will be well-positioned to thrive in an evolving legal landscape.
